Religion
Today
May 2 - 9, 2004
Christian
Rejection of the Body: A Historical Perspective
Paul V.M. Flesher
Mortification
of the flesh and asceticism, its sister activity, have long played a role in
Christian worship and life. Both activities focus on the body, along with its
emotions and attitudes, aiming to deny its influence on behavior and thought
in order to reach through one's spirit toward the divine. The body is viewed
with a decidedly jaundiced eye, never being seen as good, often being
understood as evil, but occasionally, at best, being treated neutrally.
According to this theology, the Christian's goal is to determine how to strive
toward good and spiritually uplifting behavior and attitudes by getting around
the dead weight, and even sinful counter-drag, of the body.
It
is not surprising that Christian monasticism first arose in Egypt, during the
third century. In the previous century, Egypt had provided fertile ground for
the Gnostic Christianity. Gnosticism had strong beliefs against the body. In
their theology, each human soul was actually part of God's divine essence,
called a "spark." The body's physical matter entrapped this spark
and kept it in exile from God. As a result, the goal of the Gnostic was to
release the spark by denying the body's desires and needs.
St.
Anthony is credited with being the first ascetic hermit to retreat from the
village and city life of Egyptian Christianity to live a solitary life of
prayer and contemplation. Anthony was tempted by bodily needs and appetites,
by Satan, and, even after decades of ascetic living, by worldly cares (mostly
concerning the welfare of his younger sister). His example inspired others,
who after becoming his disciples, went on to live solitary hermit lives
themselves. Their rejection of society was also a rejection of the body while
embracing a quest to live a life seeking God through spiritual means. Although
thoroughly Orthodox, the hermits shared the Gnostic view that the body acted
to separate humans from God.
In
the fourth century, Pachomius drew groups of these Egyptian monks into
organized communities. Pachomius' largest monastery is said to have held 1,400
monks. Later, Basil composed a work detailing the expected behavior, worship
and governance of monastic groups. This was called the Rule of St. Basil. The
monasteries enabled the practice of ascetic behavior within an ordered life
shared with other ascetics. The monks assisted each other in their practice of
self-denial rather than requiring everyone to accomplish this on their own, as
the hermits did.
Both
hermits and monks practiced mortification of the flesh. They tried many
different things to free themselves from the tyranny of the body, its
emotions, and its needs. Among other activities, some fasted; some took vows
of silence; some flagellated themselves; some restricted their living areas to
a small space -- Simon Stylitus in Syria even sat on a pillar for many years.
Although
they practiced the same kinds of self-denial, hermits and monks differed in an
important way. The hermits lived a free-form life. Living by themselves, they
alone chose their acts of mortification and they alone imposed those acts upon
themselves. Each hermit "fought his own devils."
The
monks, by contrast, practiced mortification guided by the instructions found
in St. Basil's rule. Fasting, for example, was guided in part by the
liturgical calendar. Physical punishment, such as flagellation, took place
according to strict guidelines. In this way, some acts of mortification could
be practiced by individuals alone, but many became activities undertaken by an
entire monastery. They were thus "public" acts of the monastic
community.
Over
the centuries, monasticism spread throughout the Mediterranean world and into
Christian Europe. As the popularity of monasticism grew, the practice of
individuals becoming hermits waned, and was often discouraged. It was
difficult to ensure that such individuals were performing only accepted
practices and not straying into some type of error. In the modern period,
asceticism is still practiced by a few, but physical mortification of the
flesh has become frowned upon and is often seen as a sign of fanaticism rather
than true faith.