Religion
Today
May 5 - 11, 2002
Clerical Celibacy in the Roman Catholic Church
Kristine Utterback
As the Roman Catholic Church tries to deal with a growing number of stories of
pedophilia by clergy and cover-up in the hierarchy, calls for the end of the
required celibacy of the priesthood are heard with increasing frequency.
Married clergy would not end the problem of pedophilia, however, since they
are not directly linked. Few celibate individuals are pedophiles, and some
married individuals are pedophiles, so a change in the marriage rules for
priests would not end the problem of sexual molestation.
That
said, however, it is also true that the Roman Catholic Church has not always
required clerical celibacy, but only for the last thousand years. While this
is a long time, it is only half the life of the Christian Church. It is true
that celibacy, living in an unmarried state, has from the start received
highest praise in Christian thought for all Christians. Paul endorsed the
single state, but allowed marriage, in the famous passage, "It is better
to marry than to burn with passion." But Peter, the Roman church founder,
was married, for Jesus cured his ailing mother-in-law.
By
the fourth century, various church councils passed legislation regarding
clerical marriage. The earliest known rule came from the Council of Elvira in
306. During the fourth and fifth centuries, other councils made further
pronouncements, especially regarding the higher clergy, those in major orders,
deacons, priests and bishops.
The
most important legislation on celibacy came later. During the 11th century a
variety of moral problems came under scrutiny by a series of reform-minded
pontiffs, and clerical marriage was at the forefront of their concerns. Many
reformers even felt that a married priest could not properly serve God.
Although clergy were in theory not to marry, the majority did, and generally
only bishops could not openly keep wives. Among the reforms instituted by Pope
Gregory VII (1073-1085) was the prohibition of clerical marriage. Gregory's
prohibition became total at the Second Lateran Council of 1139, which not only
made clerical marriage illegal, but also invalid. Priests could no longer
contract a valid marriage; their "wives" were concubines and any
children were illegitimate. Both the Council of Trent and the Vatican II
council reaffirmed the prohibition.
Laws
and practice varied greatly in the matter of clerical celibacy. Most clergy
married and lived openly with their wives and children, at least until Lateran
II. After that, married clergy became problematic, and over the centuries the
public practice declined. Even though clergy became celibate by definition,
that is, unmarried, it did not make them all chaste, refraining from sexual
activity. Stories circulated of "housekeepers" and
"nieces" living with the priest. The laity did not always approve of
the idea of enforced celibacy, either.
In
Spain the story goes that clergy were more or less forced to take wives, or
technically concubines, using the argument that if priests had wives of their
own, they would not pursue the wives of the laity. Ordinary people seem to
have had a more realistic and accepting view of human nature than did
canonists and theologians.
What
can an understanding of the beginning of the vow of celibacy bring to any
current discussion about the possibility of marriage for Roman Catholic
priests? Most importantly, the prohibition of marriage came in the middle, not
the beginning, of the church's history. It was made by papal and conciliar
decree, and it could in the same way be unmade. Obvious political realities
make this extremely unlikely, but if tomorrow the pope wanted to decree that
clergy could marry, he could do so. This is church tradition and law, and it
does not come from the magisterium, that is, it is not a matter of papal
infallibility. The Greek Orthodox Church, which shared the first millennium of
Christianity with the Roman Catholic Church before they split in 1054, has
always allowed its priests, although not its bishops, to marry.
Kristine
Utterback is an associate professor in the UW Department of History.