Religion Today
(Religion Today is contributed by UW's Religious Studies Program to examine
and promote discussion of religious issues.)
July 1 - 7, 2001
Baptist Arguments for the Separation
of Church and State
Paul V.M. Flesher
When accusations about government interference in religious practice and
belief are flying fast and furious in the news, it is easy to lose sight of the
issue. The action being attacked is often not "interference," but an
attempt to balance the religious interests of all peoples and faiths and to
treat them with neither favor nor prejudice. Whatever the particulars of a
specific incident that principle is one of which most religious groups, in
particular conservative Christian denominations, are strong proponents. This
idea, often referred to in shorthand as the separation of church and state, is
what gives the United States its famed freedom of religion.
The Southern Baptist Convention, both the largest Protestant
denomination in America and one of the most conservative, explicitly argues for
the absolute separation of church and state in its June 2000 revision of its
summary of faith, called, The Baptist Faith and Message. In the section on
"Religious Liberty," the document specifically states: "Church
and state should be separate. The state owes to every church protection and full
freedom in the pursuit of its spiritual ends. In providing for such freedom no
ecclesiastical group or denomination should be favored by the state more than
others." This means that the government, whether federal, state or local,
should allow all religious groups to pursue their beliefs and practices and
should not provide support to one of them not available to the others. The
government certainly "has no right to impose taxes for the support of any
form of religion."
The opposite should also hold true, states the official Southern Baptist
document. That is, the government should not denigrate religion in general or
any particular religion. "The state has no right to impose penalties for
religious opinions of any kind." Such "penalties" may be
monetary, such as taxes, but could also be holding those of a particular belief
at a disadvantage with regard to others. Thus the Southern Baptist Church
endorses America's religious free-for-all, and comes out against the notion that
particular religions can be disqualified, as Germany has recently determined
Scientology not to be a religion.
This of course does not mean that Southern Baptists think that all
religions are of equal value. Baptist and similar Christian beliefs are seen as
the only truth, and it is Baptist faith's goal to bring all people to what they
consider to be the truth. However, Baptists, like other religions, should not
use the power of the state to accomplish this. "The church should not
resort to the civil power to carry on its work. The gospel of Christ
contemplates spiritual means alone for the pursuit of its ends."
This strong Baptist stance in favor of keeping government and religion separate should come as no surprise to those familiar with Baptist history. Roger Williams of Rhode Island, who founded the first Baptist church in America, made its central tenet that of "Soul liberty." This principle was in opposition to the notion that churches could use governmental authority to enforce religious belief, as was being practiced in Massachusetts at that time. Williams recently had been banned from Massachusetts for daring to go against Puritan religious beliefs.
Flesher is director of UW's Religious Studies Program. More information about the program can be found on the Web at www.uwyo.edu/relstds/index.htm.