![]() |
||||
|
|
The Psychology and Law Lab Top Row (left to right): Jessica Hatz, Andre Kehn, Narina Nunez, Scott Culhane, Marty Bourgeois, and Mike Johns. Bottom row: Suzanne Karis, Jennifer Gray, Dana Binder, Bridget Waack, Nick Schwab, and Chrissy Adams
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Recent Publications/Conferences |
|||||||||||
|
Kehn, A., Gray, J.M. & Nunez, N. Hearsay Testimony: Protecting the Needs of Children at the Expense of the Defendant’s Right to a Fair Trial, Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. Perkins, J., & Bourgeois, M.J. (in press). Perceptions of police use of deadly force. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. Adams, C.M.S., & Bourgeois, M.J. (in
press). Separating
compensatory and punitive damage award decisions by trial bifurcation. Nunez, N., Dahl, M.J. & Tang, C. M. &
Jensen,
B.L. (in press) Trial Venue Decisions in Juvenile Cases: Mitigating and
Extralegal Factors Count Culhane, S. E., & Hosch, H. M. (2005). Law enforcement officers serving as jurors: Guilty because charged? Psychology, Crime and Law, 11, 305-313. Culhane, S. E. & Hosch, H. M. & Weaver, W. G. (2004). Crime victims serving as jurors: Is a bias present? Law and Human Behavior, 28, 649-659. Culhane, S. E. & Hosch, H. M. (2004). An alibi witness’s influence on juror’s decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1604-1616. |
|||||||||||
Papers in progress/under review |
|||||||||||
|
Bourgeois, M.J., Nunez, N., Adams, C.M.S., Binder, D.M. (under review) Effects of Note taking and Early Discussion on Juror Reasoning. Steblay, N., Hosch, H. M., Culhane S. E. & McWethy, A. (under review). Instructions to disregard inadmissible evidence: A meta-analysis. Espinoza, R. K. E., Willis-Esqueda, C., & Culhane, S. E. (under review). Effects of ethnicity, SES and stereotypical-congruent or stereotypical-incongruent crimes on juror decision making. |
|||||||||||
Graduate Students: |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Enhancing
juror and jury reasoning, National Science Foundation
An
examination of variations in juror reasoning and pre-deliberation verdicts
and its impact on jury processes and decision-making, National Science
Foundation |
|||||||||||
Ph.D.'s from our lab. They are gone but not forgotten. |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Every year the Psychology Department has a bowling tournament that we call Bowlorama. Research labs compete for the coveted bowling trophy. We are proud to say we have won the trophy more times than any other lab. This year was no exception. We smoked the competition and kept the traveling trophy in our lab.
|
|
||||||||||