
A juvenile who told a magistrate that he "wanted his mother
to ask for an attorney" invoked his right to counsel before police interrogated
him about a murder, a divided Texas Supreme Court has held.
However, the court also held in In the Matter of H.V. that the gun police
found — based on information they obtained when the then-16-year-old suspect
made a statement to police — is admissible as evidence.
The high court remanded the case to the 323rd District Court in Fort Worth, the
juvenile court where the murder charge is still pending.
The excerpt above is from
a recent
article in the Texas Lawyer about the April 12 decision in H.V.
H.V.'s attorney is UW College of Law alumnus M. Shawn Matlock (J.D. '01) of the Matlock Law Firm, P.C., in Fort Worth, Texas. Matlock says, "This is a historic decision because the Texas Supreme Court is not a criminal court. It is the first case heard under [Texas Family Code §56.03(b)(5)] talked about in the decision."
Matlock graduated with honors
from
His peers have repeatedly chosen Matlock as a Top
Attorney in
In addition to his practice, Mr. Matlock volunteers his time and legal skill in various ways. He has volunteered his time to support the efforts of the Southern Poverty Law Center as well as the Innocence Project of Texas and the National Innocence Project.