![]() |
CONFERENCE |
||
|
|
|||
|
|
Conference Information
|
Pre-Conference Workshop Descriptions |
Registration
Instructions | |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Following is a list of session descriptions and email
contact information for the presenters for the April 3 pre-conference
session, as well as the main session on April 4 and 5, 2003. They are
listed alphabetically, ordered by the last name of the primary
presenter. Additional materials soon will be made available by the
conference organizers and placed on the WAC Clearinghouse website at
http://wac.colostate.edu/proceedings). Visit
that site this summer as materials become available.
Pre-conference Presenters Belanger, Kelly - University of Wyoming,
krbelang@uwyo.edu This workshop addressed strategies for handling a range of writing situations. Participants enhanced strategies for effective written communication-- skills participants could pass on to students and use themselves in professional settings. The workshop focused on topics such as analyzing communication situations, building goodwill, adapting messages to audiences, making your writing easier to read, dealing with difficult persuasive situations, and writing effective informative messages such as memos, letters, and emails. O’Rourke, Pat – University of Illinois,
porourke@ilstu.edu Management decision simulators are tools that may be used to
train/educate individuals in the skills of management. Participants in
this workshop learned to use an agribusiness management simulation
[dynamic case] that was Web-enabled and may be used in an asynchronous
distance education mode in teaching agribusiness management
courses/topics. The ProStar+ simulation creates an effective medium for
learning more about the complexity of managing a business such as a
retail farm supply dealership. In The ProStar simulation may be used in classroom or distance learning
college courses. It may also be used to train industry management
personnel in either synchronous or asynchronous modes. Those interested
in a demonstration should contact the author at porourke@ilstu.edu. This workshop provided an overview of key instructional concepts in writing in the disciplines, and provided an overview of the key technologies available to support writing in the disciplines, including network communication tools, document production tools, course management systems, and database-driven instructional Web sites. It also introduced participants to key Web-based resources available to support writing in the disciplines, including the WAC Clearinghouse, and introduced participants to a database-driven, multimedia instructional Web site for writing in agriculture: the Writing in Agriculture Room in Colorado State University’s Writing Studio Conference Presenters Adkison, Stephen and Keith Comer – Idaho
State University, A hands-on session for faculty interested in using focused writing assignments to encourage conscious and reasoned inquiry in their classrooms. The goal of this session was for participants to develop sound and individualized techniques for improving student thinking and writing in their courses and to engage in the larger dialog concerning teaching and learning within and across the disciplines. Barrick, Kirby– University of Illinois,
kbarrick@uiuc.edu Problem-solving is a teaching technique that can be used to teach content while teaching students to think critically, reason, and make informed decisions. The goal of this session was to teach participants five problem-solving methods and help them develop the ability to identify situations in their content area where problem-solving techniques can be used appropriately. Bean, John - Seattle University,
jbean@seattleu.edu This plenary workshop included an overview to Writing Across the Curriculum, general theories for teaching critical thinking, a discussion of writing assignments as ill-structured problems, and ten easy to use strategies for designing short writing/thinking tasks. Calkins, Chris R. – University of Nebraska,
ccalkins1@unl.edu Interactive student journals serve multiple purposes in an upper level undergraduate course. Students are required to prepare a journal entry each week, which consists of some printed matter from the discipline. Newspaper articles, trade publications, internet stories, journal articles, and promotional/advertising materials have all been used to satisfy the assignment. Each entry must include a copy of the material and address: a) student reaction to the information b) identification of questions which might arise in the student c) how the information might be flawed/biased, and d) the potential impact of the issue or article on the discipline. The intent is to get students to interact with current issues in the field and to provoke critical evaluation of printed media. Journals must be brought to each class and the instructor frequently asks students to write in them during class. This prompts students to synthesize the information that has been presented in class and to re-connect with the instructor if their attention is drifting. Journals are graded on a +/- system to encourage a free-flow of thought. Other, structured writing assignments address the important issues of grammar, spelling, structure and thought within written communications. The instructor often responds to questions raised by the students and uses the journal as a way to communicate directly without the formality of a face-to-face meeting. Students therefore remain connected to the course throughout the semester, develop their knowledge of current issues, and enhance their critical thinking skills. Condon, Bill, Lori Carris and Vicki
McCracken - Washington State University
bcondon@wsu.edu;
carris@wsu.edu;
mccracke@wsu.edu The session began with a brief outline of the Washington State University Critical Thinking Project. At WSU, we have developed and implemented an assessment instrument, a "Critical Thinking Rubric" which affords a fine-grained measure of students' progress in achieving higher order thinking skills over the course of their college careers. The instrument employs multiple dimensions, based both on the scholarly literature on critical thinking and widely accepted models of the maturation processes that students go through in college. Faculty from the College of Agriculture and Home Economics (CAHE) have used the rubric in promoting writing and critical thinking. Their experiences indicate that it demystifies classroom expectations, and allows students a clearly articulated set of criteria to work toward. The rubric has also acted as a diagnostic tool for faculty to reflect upon and revise their own teaching and evaluative strategies in an attempt to foster student critical thinking and writing. It has also served as a discussion starter for departments and the college as a whole to look at our expectations for critical thinking. Bill Condon provided an overview of the history of the Critical Thinking Project at WSU. Vicki McCracken discussed the use of the Critical Thinking rubric in the College from an administrator's perspective. Lori Carris presented her experience with the Critical Thinking rubric in a graduate-level mycology course, and some of the challenges in using the rubric in a course with a substantial number of non-native English speakers. The writing assignment and modified rubric are available at http://classes.plantpath.wsu.edu/plp521/. Further information about the Critical Thinking rubric is available at http://wsuctproject.wsu.edu.Diebel, Penelope – Oregon State University,
penny.diebel@eou.edu The presenter shared experiences from the Oregon Writing Project Summer Workshop including writing as learning, making better writers…not better papers, expectations of ESL writers, and whether the best teachers of writers are writers themselves. The presenter’s plans for changing writing assignments and grading practices and overall perspectives of writers were described. Ehrhart, Bob– Oregon State University,
bob.ehrhart@orst.edu The growth of distance education programs offers new challenges and exciting opportunities. One of these challenges is encouraging students to think critically about issues when they are not physically located with either instructor or classmates. Techniques to overcome these challenges include papers requiring analysis, interactive discussions using electronic media, and directed field exercises. Hamilton, Lynn– California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo campus,
lhamilto@calpoly.edu Agribusiness 101 has typically been a principle of agribusiness course, taught primarily with lectures and assessed via midterms, quizzes, and finals. We have recently created a series of writing assignments on agribusiness topics to encourage students to improve their writing skills, and to allow students to receive feedback early on in their college careers regarding their writing abilities. Hastings, Steven E. – University of
Delaware, hastings@udel.edu NRM is a relatively new interdisciplinary major in the College of Agriculture at the University of Delaware that has attracted very high quality students. This presentation included a discussion of problem-based learning techniques recently introduced into courses in statistical research methods, environmental law, community economic development, and a senior capstone course. Holland, Allison Denman–University of
Arkansas at Little Rock,
adholland@ualr.edu Activities included a discussion of potential writing assignments to improve writing at all stages. These assignments were designed to produce high interest, high quality essays. Participants brainstormed topics of interest to students in their respective areas of the country that could both stimulate student thinking and lead to the overall improvement of student writing in an academic environment. MacDougall, Neal– California Polytechnic
State University, San Luis Obispo campus,
nmacdoug@calpoly.edu This presentation reviewed the various levels of resources available to aid faculty in promoting better writing in class. Beginning at the course level and working up to the Western Ag university level, the presentation focused on straightforward strategies and goals to begin a progressively more sophisticated use of writing resources. Martin, Robert & Rebecca Burnett – Iowa
State University,
drmartin@iastate.edu;
rburnett@iastate.edu The session explained the history, structure, and operation of the AgComm program. Participants explored a variety of constructs that contribute to CAC programs. These include specific communication tools and strategies could be used in technical agriculture courses to help students better learn the knowledge and skills in agriculture and communicate more successfully as professionals. McLeod, Don, Carl Olson and Ed Bradley–
University of Wyoming,
ebradley@uwyo.edu;
dmcleod@uwyo.edu Undergraduate writing often lacks incentives and professional immediacy for quality performance. Capstone project courses can achieve many of the following: Writing that requires the student to draw on the curriculum and learned skills of the major; Major-specific writing that provides a transition into one's profession; and development of profession-related communication skills where project analysis is documented and defended. It provides sequential task-specific assignments that increase student familiarity with topic and in turn improves the writing quality. Instructors are then able to address critical thinking issues and in turn the attendant writing in a piece-wise fashion. Instructors are able to be efficient evaluators while students build to a satisfying final outcome: a paper indicating their problem solving and communications skills. Click here for McLeod's Power Point presentation. Nelson, Jane - University of Wyoming,
jnelson@uwyo.edu Park, William– University of Tennessee and
Kurt Stephenson, Virginia Tech,
wpark@utk.edu;
kurts@vt.edu Participants reviewed the variety of classroom games and simulations that address issues related to natural resources management and environmental policy options. They also learned general guidelines for increasing the effectiveness of this instructional approach. A pollution allowance trading game used by the authors was demonstrated. Peele, Tom– Boise State University,
tpeele@boisestate.edu Many basic writing students placed in remedial writing classes already have extensive knowledge about language and writing strategies. Allowing students to engage deeply with the text – both what they read and what they write – better prepares them to function as critical thinkers beyond the writing classroom. Polito, Tom and Dave Roberts – Iowa State
University,
tpolito@iastate.edu;
droberts@iastate.edu This workshop described leading-edge work in two major movements in higher education: Communication Across the Curriculum (CAC) and Learning Communities (LC). Faculty in disparate fields can work together to connect courses students normally experience in isolation. The LC described can serve as a model for other "content" and "communication" collaborations. Reynolds, Carl & Carol Bryant – University
of Wyoming, aged@uwyo.edu;
bryantcj@uwyo.edu Questioning is one of the most natural ways to stimulate inquiry, inquisitiveness, and critical thinking about a problem or situation. During this workshop, examples were demonstrated to illustrate strategies increasing students’ critical and creative thinking through questioning. Tools were provided to participants to facilitate the implementation of improved questioning techniques. Ryan, Mark & Josh Millspaugh – University of
Missouri,
millspaughj@missouri.edu;
ryanmr@missouri.edu This workshop modeled the use of PBL to enhance higher-order thinking skills. A variety of active learning strategies (e.g., writing-to-learn, collaborative learning, peer-teaching, active lectures, discussion, use of internet resources) can be used within the PBL teaching format. An Urban Deer Management case allowed participants to experience PBL firsthand. Seville, Scott— University of Wyoming,
sseville@uwyo.edu Two semester-long activities to enhance student learning and critical thinking were discussed. The first was student portfolios that aid study. The second was a collaborative, peer-reviewed writing project. Instructor and student perceptions of the effect of these activities on student learning were reviewed. Sherline, Ed – University of Wyoming,
sherline@uwyo.edu This presentation argued that teaching critical thinking should emphasize both the development of logic and argument skills and the development of attitudes such as open-mindedness and fair-mindedness. It provided some resources for teaching the logical skills as well as an inventory of the basic skills needed for understanding and evaluating arguments. In promoting the development of open and fair-mindedness, the presentation emphasized the use of open questions, and provided a list of questions with an eye to disciplines in agriculture. Finally, tips and activities for promoting open- and fair-mindedness were shared. Shuck, Gail – Boise State University,
gshuck@boisestate.edu This presentation focused on an assignment that asked students in an ESL class to describe where they were from – in the form of a poem. A number of students’ poems revealed far higher literacy levels than the traditional focus on grammar would allow us to notice. Smith, Greg – Higher Education Programs,
USDA, gsmith@reeusda.gov Is submitting a proposal for federal assistance like taking a shot in the dark? The purpose of this workshop was to shed light on what reviewers look for in a successful proposal, and clarify some common grant terms and procedures. Information on USDA’s Higher Education Challenge Grants Program (supporting this conference and teaching improvements throughout the nation) were included. Also, the new government E-Grant process was discussed. Tips to improve writing and classroom instruction were reviewed. Sowell, Bok and Jan Bowman – Montana State
University, bok@montana.edu;
jbowman@montana.edu This paper presentation described two types of problem-based learning assignments to improve critical thinking. The first assignment mimicked the most common problems presented to livestock extension specialists in Montana. Students are given a scenario and asked to find a plausible solution. These assignments were repeated bi-weekly and solutions were discussed in class. The second set of writing assignments recreated common range management questions and asked students to formulate solutions. Both assignments stressed using the scientific literature to solve problems. Information sources were reviewed and format was discussed initially. Feedback was provided on an individual and group basis when students selected materials and prepared drafts. Most of the subsequent class time was spent discussing how students can use critical thinking skills and research to solve problems. University of Wyoming Writing in Agriculture
Guild, wangberg@uwyo.edu This panel discussion emphasized initiatives that have been undertaken by the Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics and the Department of Family and Consumer Sciences in the College of Agriculture at the University of Wyoming. Specific topics included writing in capstone courses, ePortfolio documentation of skills and competencies by students, consistency in faculty feedback of student writing, curriculum evaluation strategies, and curriculum revision. Williams, Karen Cachevki - University of
Wyoming, cachevki@uwyo.edu This paper presented findings of a study conducted with faculty and students in the departments of Agriculture and Applied Economics and Family and Consumer Sciences at the University of Wyoming. Methodology of the study included faculty focus groups, student interviews, and artifact analysis. Comparisons of faculty and student perceptions of writing, feedback, and curriculum were described in the paper, as well as curricular changes that resulted from the research. Wilson, Tom– University of Arizona,
twilson@ag.arizona.edu The Introduction to Environmental Science course (NATS 101) at the University of Arizona introduces lower-division college students to relationships between human societies and natural systems. It also encourages the development of critical thinking and technical writing techniques. This interactive presentation showed how these students developed critical thinking strategies by evaluating various websites, and how they used assigned lab reports to develop technical writing skills. Student Panel Evans, Ross, Teresa Nelson, Laci Witowski - University of Wyoming, rostifer@uwyo.edu; tnelsonwyo@hotmail.com; lace@uwyo.edu A conference on student writing and critical thinking would be incomplete without student participation and input. Therefore this panel, comprised of three undergraduate students from the food and agricultural sciences, was organized. Each student offered a personal story and perspective on learning to write and to think critically. Each commented on academic experiences that were beneficial in developing these skills. The students offered individual perspectives on what may be missing or what may have need improvement if they were to optimize their learning.
|
|||
|
|||
|
This conference was made
possible by and funded in part by |
|||
|
|
Conference
Information
|
Pre-Conference Workshop Descriptions | Conference
Paper Abstracts | |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Copyright
© 2002 University of Wyoming College of Agriculture. |
|||