This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.
Skip Navigation skip menu and banner
University of Wyoming


October 30, 2007

Wyoming SBIR/STTR Initiative (WSSI) Newsletter
No. 11-07
(Past Newsletter Issues)

This Wyoming SBIR/STTR Initiative (WSSI) Newsletter is available in its entirety at http://www.uwyo.edu/sbir/newsletter/nwsltr_071030.htm.

It is published by the Wyoming SBIR/STTR Initiative (WSSI). Please visit our website at www.uwyo.edu/sbir for complete program information (including links to participating federal agencies, support agencies, conferences, archives of this newsletter, etc.) Contact WSSI@uwyo.edu to be added to or removed from the Distribution List for this newsletter.

SOLICITATION COUNTDOWN

WSSI Phase 0: due 5:00 p.m., 11/1/07; 2 days – submit to WSSI@uwyo.edu
HHS/NIH SBIR Contracts: due 11/5/07; 6 days
DOE SBIR Grants: due 11/27/07; 29 days
NSF SBIR/STTR: due 12/4/07 - 36 days

HHS/NIH SBIR/STTR Grants: due 12/5/07 - 37 days
DoD SBIR 2008.1: Released 11/13/07; due 1/9/08 - 87 days
NOAA SBIR 2008-1: Released 1/23/08 - 86 days
DOC/NIST SBIR: Released 11/5/07; due 1/24/08 - 87 days
DOC/NIST TT SBIR: Released 11/5/07; due 1/24/08 - 87 days
2007 SBIR/STTR SOLICITATION RELEASE SCHEDULE  – All Agencies; Courtesy of ZYN Systems at www.zyn.com

CONTENT

1.0 Congratulations To Our October Phase 0 Award Winner
2.0 Congratulations to Wyoming Silicon - A NSF Phase I Award
3.0 Congratulations to Alces Technology - A DoD Phase II Award
4.0 Wyoming No Longer Receiving NIH SBIR Grants - WHY?
5.0 Federal Appropriation Requests Due in January
6.0 Why Do Entrepreneurs Choose Venture Capital?
7.0 When Seed Funding is Better!
8.0 Angel Investors Crucial for Colorado Start-Up
9.0 "Bootstrapping" Your Way to Success
10. Small Schools with Big-Tech Dreams
11. Grant Proposal Writing Workshop - Dec 3-5
12. Blogsite for Wyoming Entrepreneurs
13. Acknowledgements and Publication Information

1.0 Congratulations to our October phase 0 award winners

Z4 Energy Systems, Laramie
Principal Investigator: Kevin Luke
Email: z4energy@earthlink.net
Phase 0 Title: Wind Powered Compressed Air Energy Storage
Phase I Target: NSF/Emerging Opportunities

return to CONTENTS

2.0  Congratulations to Wyoming Silicon

Congratulations to Wyoming Silicon, LLC, Sheridan, a recent winner of a $100,000 SBIR Phase I research grant from the National Science Foundation. The company will develop a new pressure sensor based on a patented micro-electromechanical system (MEMS). The new device is intended for making highly accurate water depth measurements for use in environmental monitoring of ground water. For further information, contact Zachary Gray zg@wyomingsilicon.com.

return to CONTENTS

3.0  Congratulations to Alces Technology - DoD Phase ii Award

Congratulations to Alces Technology, Jackson, recent recipients of a $750,000 Phase II SBIR contract with the DOD/Air Force to develop a Light Valve for use in High Resolution Laser Projection Display Systems.  For further information, contact Dave Bloom dbloom@alcestech.com

 return to CONTENTS

4.0  Wyoming No longer receiving NIH sbir grants - why?

During the first five of the nine years of the WSSI Phase 0 program, Wyoming had an outstanding record of receiving SBIR awards from the NIH; 23 Phase I proposal submissions resulting in 16 Phase I grant awards, a conversion rate of a phenomenal 70%. As a result, NIH became our ‘go to’ SBIR agency. But in the subsequent four years, Wyoming submitted another 23 Phase I proposals but received only one award during that time. This dramatic turn of events has led to a significant drop in the availability of SBIR ‘seed capital’ to emerging tech-based Wyoming small businesses.  What has caused this disastrous turn of events and what can be done to reverse it? Please send your comments and suggestions to ewatson@wyoming.com.  

return to CONTENTS

5.0  federal appropriation earmark requests due in January

A growing number of WSSI/SBIR client companies have been applying to members of our congressional delegation for earmarked federal appropriations – FY08 budget requests from seven existing and potential WSSI clients total $32 million. For obvious reasons, this source of funding is becoming increasingly popular among our tech-based small businesses – total Wyoming funding over the 25 years of the SBIR program is approximately equal to the one year FY08 earmark request total.

To be considered for a FY09 budget earmark, your request should be submitted to our two senators and our representative during January 2008. Prior contact with our congressional delegation is encouraged to ensure compliance with the process – for example, a request form should be completed and submitted as a part of the process. To receive a request form, call:

Senator Barrasso – Tel 202-224-6441
Senator Enzi – Tel 202-224-3424
Representative Cubin – Tel 202-225-2311

return to CONTENTS

6.0 why do Entrepreneurs choose venture capital?

At some point, most start-up businesses require an infusion of outside capital to grow into a profitable enterprise. This infusion often comes in the form of venture capital (VC) investment, which provides capital and some degree of managerial guidance in exchange for an equity stake in the company. Venture investment can be a blessing for entrepreneurs looking to survive the risk-filled early stage of firm development and to professionalize their business, but it also reduces the entrepreneur's incentive to create a highly profitable company. The entrepreneur loses some of the freedom to govern the company as he sees fit, and once the company makes a successful exit, the venture investors will claim their share of the profits.

Despite the visibility of the VC industry, only 10 percent of start-ups receive VC support. The remaining 90 percent turn elsewhere for outside funding, often from commercial banks. Bank loans do not come with the same strings attached as venture investment, but borrowers do not have access to the managerial and industry guidance that may be available through venture firms. Entrepreneurs are forced to make it on their own but are allowed to govern their company as they see fit and collect a greater share of the profits.

In the current issue of the Journal of Business Venturing, Jean-Etienne de Bettignies and James Brander of the University of British Columbia's Saunder School of Business investigate the decision-making process of entrepreneurs faced with the choice of pursuing VC or securing a bank loan. The decision, they find, hinges on the value of input from the venture firm. Without this input, bank financing would always be preferable to venture investment. Entrepreneurs, however, cannot be sure of the value of VC guidance from the outset. They must offer a sufficient incentive to venture firms to be highly involved, but doing so will decrease their own incentive to perform.

The authors find that VC investment is most appropriate when the value of entrepreneurial input is low. If this is the case, VC firms can be given a large enough equity stake in the company to provide an incentive to be heavily involved in company development. If the value of entrepreneurial input is low, then reducing the ownership of the entrepreneur is less likely to hamper the company's growth. Companies that depend on the input of the individual entrepreneur may fare better with bank financing.

Their model also suggests that venture investment is most desirable when the industry of the start-up company aligns with an area of expertise for the VC firm. Without that kind of alignment, the VC firm may not be able to provide sufficient input to make the equity tradeoff worthwhile. The authors argue that the need for specialized VC knowledge is the reason that certain industries, such as software and biotech, have become dominant in venture investing. These industries require a great deal of specialized managerial knowledge, increasing the value of VC input.

This model may be useful for states seeking to improve high-tech start-ups' access to capital. Since public organizations often lack the specialized knowledge of high-tech industries possessed by private venture capital firms, it may be more beneficial to use state funds to offer and improve access to loans than to make public equity investments. Alternatively, state equity programs could be divided into separate programs that serve individual industries, staffed by experienced industry veterans. (SSTI Weekly Digest)

return to CONTENTS

7.0 When seed funding is better!

It’s surprising how often first-time entrepreneurs say they need $5 million. Not many companies need that amount in their first round of funding. Much of the time, what they need at the earliest stage is enough money to prove the concept and mitigate some initial risk. Often, what they require is seed funding, more on the order of $250,000 or $500,000: Venture Beat

return to CONTENTS

8.0 Angel investors crucial for Colorado start-ups

Angel investment remains crucial fuel for Colorado startup companies that are too young or unproven to attract venture capital or private equity funding, says Gary Held, president of CTEK, a Denver-based nonprofit that supports entrepreneurs: Denver Business Journal

return to CONTENTS

9.0 "Bootstrapping" your way to success!

Starting a business from scratch with little or no funding can be frightening. But this “bootstrapping” approach also can allow entrepreneurs to spend more time on their product or service rather than looking for investors:
Kansas City Star

return to CONTENTS

10.0 small schools with big-tech dreams

Call them the littler schools that could. That's the theme of a just-released study on technology transfer that looked at the surprising tech transfer results of a number of smaller colleges and universities whose research and development budgets fell far short of the funds expended by tech development superstars such as MIT and Stanford: Business Week
 

return to CONTENTS

11.0 grant proposal writing workshops Dec 3-5

The Grant Institute's Grants 101: Professional Grant Proposal Writing Workshop will be held at the University of Wyoming, December 3 - 5, 2007. Interested development professionals, researchers, faculty, and graduate students should register as soon as possible. All participants will receive certification in professional grant writing from the Institute. For further information go to www.thegrantinstitute.com

return to CONTENTS

12.0 blogsite for Wyoming entrepreneurs

The Wyoming Business Council has established a source of useful information for Wyoming entrepreneurs - a blogsite.  It's at http://www.wyospace.com/ - check it out and add your comments.

return to CONTENTS

13.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND PUBLICATION INFORMATION

TO BE ADDED TO OR REMOVED FROM THE DISTRIBUTION LIST FOR THIS NEWSLETTER, SEND NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER, AND EMAIL ADDRESS TO WSSI@uwyo.edu

This newsletter is published monthly as part of the Wyoming SBIR/STTR Initiative (WSSI). The mission of the Initiative is to increase the number of federal Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Program awards to Wyoming. The Wyoming Business Council (WBC) funds the initiative which is administered by the University of Wyoming Research Office. Please contact Gene Watson ewatson@wyoming.com with your comments.

return to CONTENTS

END